Regal Assets Analytics

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Disclosure: The owners of this website may be paid to recommend Regal Assets. The content on this website, including any positive reviews of Regal Assets and other reviews, may not be neutral or independent.

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Disclosure: The owners of this website may be paid to recommend Regal Assets. The content on this website, including any positive reviews of Regal Assets and other reviews, may not be neutral or independent.

Home World News Washington Post World News UK Supreme Court rules Scotland’s bid for independence vote

UK Supreme Court rules Scotland’s bid for independence vote

0
9

Remark

LONDON – Britain’s Supreme Court will rule on Wednesday whether Scotland can hold an independence vote without the consent of the British government, a case with huge implications for the future of the United Kingdom.

The semi-autonomous Scottish government has asked the highest court to decide whether the Scottish Parliament can hold a referendum in October asking “Should Scotland be an independent country?”

The Conservative British government in London refuses to authorize a vote, saying the issue was resolved in a 2014 referendum in which Scottish voters rejected independence by a margin of 55% to 45%.

However, the pro-independence government in Edinburgh wants to review the decision, arguing that Britain’s departure from the European Union – opposed by a majority of Scottish voters – has radically changed the political and economic landscape.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon argues she has a democratic mandate from the Scottish people to hold another secession vote because there is an independence-supporting majority in the Scottish Parliament.

At High Court hearings last month, Dorothy Bain, the Scottish government’s most senior prosecutor, said the majority of Scotland’s legislators had been elected on the basis of commitments to hold a new independence referendum. She also said a referendum would be advisory rather than legally binding – although a “yes” vote would create strong momentum for Scotland to break free.

British government lawyer James Eadie argued that the power to hold a referendum rests with the British Parliament in London because “it is of vital importance to the United Kingdom as a whole”, not just Scotland.

Polls show that Scots are roughly evenly split on independence – and also that a majority of voters do not want another referendum anytime soon.

The five Supreme Court judges deciding the case could rule that Scotland has the power to hold a referendum, or that it has no power – or they could simply refuse to rule.

Scottish legal expert Andrew Tickell said that “even if the Scottish Government wins this and gets a chance to pass a piece of legislation…it won’t be the end of the story.”

Independence supporters plan to gather outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh and other locations after the verdict, regardless of the outcome.

Scotland and England have been politically united since 1707. Scotland has had its own parliament and government since 1999 and makes its own policy on public health, education and other matters. The British government in London controls matters such as defense and fiscal policy.

Sturgeon says if her government loses the court case, it will make the next UK national election a de facto plebiscite on ending Scotland’s three-century-old union with England. She hasn’t given any details on how that would work.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here